Three quarters of the battery is below the thrust line and my body from my arm pits down is below the thrust line as well. When I said this motor has a low CG I meant relative to other mid level hang point motors. What you said about the connection point being in line with the thrust is correct but what I said about the CG is also correct.
When you apply thrust the whole motor moves forward while the wing lags back. This changes the AOA of the wing. The motor wants to stay at the same angle relative to the wing because, like you said, the connection points are in line with the thrust. However, now the CG is in front of the hang points instead of below it so it’s the CG that pulls the motor AOA back down. The more thrust you apply the more you swing forward and the more the motor angle change relative to the suspension lines. With the static test the angle change is more which I think was your point and I agree. My point was that the same effect is seen in flight but I didn’t mean to the same degree as the static test. However, the change is still very significant… so much so that I can’t get into my seat on takeoff until I am high enough to ease off the throttle. Which, by the way, is a safer position during takeoff because the motor isn’t tilted back causing potential line twist.